Acknowledgments |
|
xi | |
|
|
1 | (32) |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
The Test Case as Originally and Traditionally Tried |
|
|
8 | (25) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
People v. Beasley, 622 N.E. 1236 (Ill. App. 5 Dist. 1993) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (11) |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Prosecutor's Opening Statement |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Defense Counsel's Opening Statement |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Prosecutor's Closing Argument |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Defense Counsel's Closing Argument |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (5) |
|
A Review of the Relevant Literature |
|
|
33 | (36) |
|
A Brief Overview of History: Social and Legal Issues |
|
|
33 | (4) |
|
|
37 | (7) |
|
Individual/Biological Perspectives |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Socio-Cultural Perspectives |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Family Violence Perspectives |
|
|
39 | (5) |
|
Social Science Research on Women Who Kill |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
Existing Theories on Women Who Kill |
|
|
49 | (6) |
|
The First Theory: Homicidal Behavior Among Women |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
The Second Theory: Postpartum Depression or Psychosis |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
The Third Theory: Battered Woman Syndrome |
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (13) |
|
Battering as a Slow Homicidal Process: A Social Interaction Perspective |
|
|
69 | (24) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (14) |
|
Battering Issues in Realistic Social Perspective |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Socialization Differences |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
The Physical Size and Strength Differential |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Misconceptions about Social Resources |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
The Battering Cycle as a Slow Homicidal Process |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
Putting It All Together in a Theoretical Framework |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
|
84 | (9) |
|
The Law of Self-Defense and the Battered Woman |
|
|
93 | (74) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Self-Defense as a Justification |
|
|
101 | (5) |
|
Traditional Elements of Self Defense |
|
|
106 | (23) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
By What Standard Do We Measure Reasonableness? |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
The Blending of Objective and Subjective Tests |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
Reasonableness and the Model Penal Code |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
What Is a ``Threat of Imminent Harm?'' |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Is ``Imminent'' Harm the Same as ``Immediate'' Harm? |
|
|
123 | (5) |
|
Imminence Is Closely Related to Reasonableness |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Law of Self Defense Is Advanced by Reliance on Proof of Necessity |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
Law of Self Defense Is Advanced by Allowing Contextual Evidence |
|
|
132 | (15) |
|
Expert Testimony to Establish the Context of Abuse |
|
|
132 | (4) |
|
Use of Expert Testimony to Establish Reasonableness of Defendant's Belief in the Necessity of Self-Defense |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
Use of Expert Testimony to Dispel Myths about Battered Women and Battering |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
Use of Expert Testimony to Show Typical Emotional and Behavioral Responses of Battered Women |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Expert Testimony Is Generally Not Admissible to Establish Defendant's State of Mind |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
Lay Testimony to Establish the Context of Abuse |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
Instructing the Jury on Self-Defense |
|
|
147 | (12) |
|
When Self Defense Instruction Is Refused in Battered Woman Cases |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
When Self Defense Instruction Is Given, It Generally Tracks Statutory Language |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
When Self Defense Instruction Is Given, It May Include Specific Reference to the Battering Relationship |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
The Battering Relationship May Be Considered Along with Every Other Fact in Determining Self-Defense |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
The Battering Relationship May Be Considered to Determine Whether the Defendant Honestly Believed She Was in Imminent Danger |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
The Battering Relationship May Be Considered to Determine If the Defendant Acted Reasonably |
|
|
155 | (4) |
|
|
159 | (8) |
|
The Traditional Test Case Revisited |
|
|
167 | (18) |
|
|
167 | (18) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Socialization Differences |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
Physical Size and Strength Differences |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
|
173 | (3) |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
178 | (5) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
Application of These Theoretical Ideas to Gay and Lesbian Battering |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
|
What Is Same-Sex Domestic Violence? |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Myths and Stereotypes Regarding Lesbian and Gay Domestic Violence |
|
|
887 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (8) |
|
Application of Ogle and Jacobs' Perspective to Lesbian and Gay Battering and Battering Escalation |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Three Elements That Influence the Battering Interaction |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
The Battering Cycle as an Interaction Process |
|
|
201 | (3) |
|
|
204 | |