Foreword |
|
iii | |
Part One The Vision of Restorative Justice |
|
1 | (52) |
|
Visions and Patterns: Why Patterns of Thinking Obstruct Criminal Justice Reform |
|
|
3 | (12) |
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
Streams and Structures: The Creation of a New Pattern of Thinking |
|
|
15 | (22) |
|
|
16 | (11) |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Mediation/Conferencing/Circles |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
The Term ``Restorative Justice'' |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Explorers of Restorative Justice Theory |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
Restorative Justice: Justice That Promotes Healing |
|
|
37 | (16) |
|
Restorative Justice as Opposed to What? |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
Restorative Justice: A Visual Model |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
|
49 | (4) |
Part Two The Values of Restorative Justice |
|
53 | (100) |
|
|
55 | (24) |
|
|
57 | (4) |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
|
71 | (6) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
79 | (20) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Who Should Receive Restitution? |
|
|
86 | (4) |
|
Should Restitution Reflect the Seriousness of the Offense or of the Injury? |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
For Which Injuries Should Restitution be Provided? |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
When Restitution is Not Feasible |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
Evaluation and Other Ongoing Issues |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
|
99 | (24) |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
Reintegrating Communities |
|
|
110 | (10) |
|
Support and Assistance Groups |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
Faith Communities as Reintegrating Communities |
|
|
113 | (7) |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
|
123 | (30) |
|
Restorative Justice and Inclusion |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Victim Inclusion in the Criminal Justice System |
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Giving the Victim Legal Standing to Participate in Criminal Proceedings |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
The History of Victim Involvement in Criminal Cases |
|
|
133 | (7) |
|
The Professionalization of Justice Reduces the Victims' Role |
|
|
136 | (4) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Victim Participation at Various Stages of Criminal Proceedings |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Arraignment through Presentencing |
|
|
143 | (3) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
The Victim as Civil Claimant in Criminal Cases |
|
|
146 | (4) |
|
|
146 | (4) |
|
|
150 | (3) |
Part Three The Venture Toward Restorative Justice |
|
153 | (98) |
|
Conceptual Objections to Restorative Justice |
|
|
156 | (29) |
|
This Means the End of Criminal Law |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
Multiple Parties Cannot Pursue Multiple Goals and Achieve a Single Overarching Purpose |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
Not All Harms Can Be Identified, and of Those That Are, Not All Are of Equal Importance |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
Government and Community Will Not Be Able to Share Responsibility for Public Safety in the Way Anticipated by Restorative Justice Theory |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
This Will Reduce Due Process Protection |
|
|
168 | (4) |
|
Victims Cannot Receive Adequate Attention in Any Model That Simultaneously Considers Offender Rehabilitation |
|
|
172 | (4) |
|
This Will Cause Unacceptable Disparity of Sanctions |
|
|
176 | (4) |
|
Coercion Will be Necessary, and Coercion is Antithetical to a Restorative Model |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (4) |
|
Practical Objections to Restorative Justice |
|
|
185 | (20) |
|
Restorative Justice Will Not Work with Dangerous Offenders |
|
|
186 | (5) |
|
Most Victims and Offenders are Never Identified |
|
|
191 | (3) |
|
Large-Scale Use of Restorative Justice Will Lead to its Depersonalization |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
Individualistic and Pluralistic Cultures Will Keep Restorative Justice from Working |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
Restorative Justice May Work for Minor Crimes, but Certainly Not for Murder |
|
|
198 | (4) |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
Planning for Restorative Justice |
|
|
205 | (16) |
|
Build Support for Restorative Justice |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
Develop a Credible Coalition |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
|
213 | (3) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
Realign Vision and Practice |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Toward a Restorative System |
|
|
221 | (18) |
|
The Relationship of Restorative Programs to the Criminal Justice System |
|
|
221 | (3) |
|
Four Models of a Restorative System |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
A Framework for Thinking about a Restorative System |
|
|
228 | (9) |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
|
239 | (12) |
|
Transformation of Perspective |
|
|
241 | (4) |
|
Transformation of Structures |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
Transformation of Persons |
|
|
247 | (4) |
Appendix |
|
251 | (22) |
|
Declaration of Leuven on the Advisability of Promoting the Restorative Approach to Juvenile Crime |
|
|
253 | (8) |
|
CE Recommendation No. R (99) 19 Concerning Mediation in Penal Matters (CE, 1999) |
|
|
261 | (6) |
|
[Draft] Basic Principles on the Use of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal Matters (UN, 2000) |
|
|
267 | (6) |
Selected Bibliography |
|
273 | (24) |
Subject Index |
|
297 | (12) |
Name Index |
|
309 | |