Preface |
|
ix | |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
Quality Assessment in Higher Education: A Conceptual Model |
|
|
9 | (10) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
The contexts for quality assessment |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
The methods of quality assessment |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
The impact of quality assessment |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Values and quality assessment |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
The politics of quality assessment |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Changing National Contexts: The Rise of Quality Management Assessment |
|
|
19 | (16) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Expansion, diversification and funding cuts |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
Changing relations between higher education and the state |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
The emergence of national quality agencies |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
A supra-national element in Europe |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
Changing Institutional Contexts: Autonomy and Accountability |
|
|
35 | (15) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
Differences between institutions |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
Multiple evaluations and planning in a French university |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
Accountability and development at a Welsh university |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Creating a new institution in Finland |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Departments with problems in Amsterdam |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
Quality assessment in the highly regulated Italian context |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Quality assessment for increased productivity in Mexico |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Conclusion: A need to comply and a need to change |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
The Methods of the Quality Agencies |
|
|
50 | (20) |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (8) |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
The Methods of Quality Assessment in Institutions |
|
|
70 | (18) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Long-standing concern for quality |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Reasons, levels and purposes of internal quality assessment |
|
|
71 | (5) |
|
Methods of quality assessment |
|
|
76 | (10) |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Impact of Quality Assessment through Rewards |
|
|
88 | (13) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Rewards of formal status allocation |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
|
94 | (4) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
Impact of Quality Assessment through Changing Policies and Structures |
|
|
101 | (14) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Do institutional policies matter? |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Substantive policy changes in institutions |
|
|
103 | (5) |
|
Fundamental changes in policy making and organization structure |
|
|
108 | (4) |
|
Accountability, information and quality assurance |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
Impact of Quality Assessment through Changing Cultures |
|
|
115 | (14) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
Quality assessment and cultural change |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
Impact upon institutional cultures in the IMHE case studies |
|
|
121 | (6) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
Quality Assessment and Institutional Change |
|
|
129 | (12) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
Quality management and assessment in the life of institutions |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
The role of national agencies |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
The impact of quality assessment |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
|
139 | (2) |
Appendix I: Institutional Case Studies |
|
141 | (3) |
Appendix II: Framework for Institutional Case Studies |
|
144 | (2) |
Appendix III: Framework for Case Studies of Impact by National Quality Assurance Agencies |
|
146 | (2) |
References |
|
148 | (5) |
Index |
|
153 | (8) |
The Society for Research into Higher Education |
|
161 | |