Preface |
|
iii | |
|
|
xi | |
|
|
xiii | |
Summary |
|
xv | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxi | |
Abbreviations |
|
xxiii | |
|
|
1 | (14) |
|
History of the Joint Strike Fighter |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Final Assembly and Checkout of the Joint Strike Fighter |
|
|
5 | (5) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
How This Report Is Organized |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (22) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
General Policy Issues Related to Splitting Defense Production |
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Arguments For and Against Splitting Production |
|
|
21 | (8) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
Three Post-World War II Aircraft: F-86, F-100, and B-52 |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
Coproduction of an Aircraft |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Coproduction of Navy Systems by Multiple Contractors |
|
|
33 | (3) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Site Selection Issues: Plant and Major Facility Requirements for FACO |
|
|
37 | (12) |
|
Specific Site Physical Requirements |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Categories of FACO Options |
|
|
38 | (7) |
|
Option 1: A ``Greenfield'' Site |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
Option 2: A Site with an Existing Airfield Only |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Option 3: An Airfield with Existing Buildings Capable of Supporting JSF FACO |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Option 4: A Site with a Current DoD Operation or Depot Activity with Excess Building Capacity |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Option 5: Selecting a Site with a Current Military Aircraft Production Line That Has Sufficient Capacity to Accommodate JSF FACO Operations |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Option and Sites Chosen for Analysis |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (12) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
Task Distribution and Total Workforce Size for FACO |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Standard Occupational Classification System |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Other Costs Related to the Workforce |
|
|
54 | (4) |
|
Training and Other Costs Related to Special Requirements |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Workers' Compensation Costs |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Special Costs Related to Different Locations |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Costs Related to Mandated Benefits for Employees |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Hiring and Training Incentive Programs |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
61 | (6) |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
Effect of Indirect Costs on JSF FACO Location |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
State and Local Tax Credits and Incentives |
|
|
67 | (16) |
|
State and Local Economic Development |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Effectiveness of Development Programs |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
State and Local Taxes in California, Georgia, and Texas |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
State Franchise and Corporate Income Taxes |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Tax Credits and Deductions |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
State and Local Economic Development Programs |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (24) |
|
|
84 | (4) |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Other Environmental Issues |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Environmental Compliance Costing Approach |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Environment Cost Estimating Overview |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
Compliance Costs for Air Emissions |
|
|
92 | (10) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
Lockheed Martin--Palmdale |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
Northrop Grumman--Palmdale |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Intangible Environmental Issues |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Enforcement Aggressiveness |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
Other Cost Factors: Stealth, Suppliers, and Energy |
|
|
107 | (18) |
|
|
107 | (5) |
|
An Overview of the JSF Stealth Requirements |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
JSF Airframe Stealth Approach During the Manufacturing Process |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
Costs of Stealth for JSF FACO |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
The Supplier and Technical Support Base, Suppliers, and Transportation Costs |
|
|
112 | (6) |
|
Supplier and Technical Support Base |
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
Supplier Representation on Site |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Logistics and Transportation Costs |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
Summary of Supplier Issues |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (7) |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
Modeling the Cost Implications of Alternative FACO Strategies for JSF Production |
|
|
125 | (24) |
|
Cost Elements in the Model |
|
|
126 | (19) |
|
|
126 | (6) |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
Investments: Facilities, Equipment, and Tooling |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (4) |
|
Environmental and Permitting Costs |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Management and Supplier Support |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
Interaction Among Cost Elements |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
FACO Production Strategy Assumptions |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
149 | (16) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
|
152 | (11) |
|
Impact of FACO Activities on Site Workload |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Base Case Versus Alternatives |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
157 | (6) |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (28) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
|
A. Legislative Language: the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
B. JSF FACO Site Assessment |
|
|
171 | (12) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
D. Environmental Regulatory Process |
|
|
185 | (8) |
Bibliography |
|
193 | |