Preface |
|
vii | |
|
What's at stake in the history of literary genre theory? |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
Neoclassical genre theory |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Nineteenth-century genre theory |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
Twentieth-century genre theory |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
Ten tendencies of literary genre theory |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
What is generally understood by the notion of film genre? |
|
|
13 | (17) |
|
Genre is a useful category, because it bridges multiple concerns |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Genres are defined by the film industry and recognized by the mass audience |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Genres have clear, stable identities and borders |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Individual films belong wholly and permanently to a single genre |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Genres are transhistorical |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Genres undergo predictable development |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Genres are located in a particular topic, structure and corpus |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
Genre films share certain fundamental characteristics |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
Genres have either a ritual or an ideological function |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
Genre critics are distanced from the practice of genre |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
Where do genres come from? |
|
|
30 | (19) |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
|
38 | (6) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
Joel Silver, the `Selznick of schlock' |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
|
49 | (20) |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
|
54 | (6) |
|
Noir as adjective and noun |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
|
62 | (7) |
|
Are genres subject to redefinition? |
|
|
69 | (14) |
|
Post-mortem for a phantom genre |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
Rebirth of a phantom genre |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Selling The Creature from the Black Lagoon |
|
|
78 | (5) |
|
Where are genres located? |
|
|
83 | (17) |
|
A multiplicity of locations |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Genre as textual structure: Semantics and syntax |
|
|
87 | (3) |
|
Genre as institution, institution as genre |
|
|
90 | (6) |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
|
100 | (23) |
|
A day at Walt Disney World |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (5) |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
Genres as good and bad objects |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
Name-brand marketing strategies |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Why are genres sometimes mixed? |
|
|
123 | (21) |
|
|
123 | (5) |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
|
132 | (7) |
|
Classical versus postmodern |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
What role do genres play in the viewing process? |
|
|
144 | (22) |
|
|
145 | (5) |
|
Genre films on television |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
|
156 | (8) |
|
How spectators use genres |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
What communication model is appropriate for genres? |
|
|
166 | (13) |
|
The four-hoot call of the barred owl |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
Modelling generic communication |
|
|
169 | (4) |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
A new communication model |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
Have genres and genre functions changed over time? |
|
|
179 | (16) |
|
The neoclassical nature of standard genre theory |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
Genre in the age of remote consumption |
|
|
184 | (4) |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
Sports, stars and advertising |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
Genre in the new millennium |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
What can genres teach us about nations? |
|
|
195 | (12) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
Regenrifying the national anthem |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
|
205 | (2) |
Conclusion: A semantic/syntactic/pragmatic approach to genre |
|
207 | (9) |
|
A semantic/syntactic/pragmatic approach |
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
Reception, opposition, poaching |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Planning and using cities and texts |
|
|
213 | (3) |
Appendix: `A semantic/syntactic approach to film genre' |
|
216 | (11) |
Bibliography |
|
227 | (10) |
Index |
|
237 | |