Contributors and Editors |
|
xiii | |
Abbreviations |
|
xv | |
Law Reports |
|
xviii | |
Journals |
|
xix | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
Part I NGOs and Human Rights Courts and Compliance Bodies |
|
|
9 | (96) |
|
International Courts and Compliance Bodies: The Experience of Amnesty International |
|
|
11 | (30) |
|
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (5) |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
International Court of Justice |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
International criminal courts and tribunals |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (20) |
|
|
17 | (9) |
|
Organization of American States |
|
|
26 | (6) |
|
Organization of African Unity / African Union |
|
|
32 | (5) |
|
|
37 | (4) |
|
The Experience of the AIRE Centre in Litigating before the European Court of Human Rights |
|
|
41 | (6) |
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Taking Cases to Strasbourg |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Proposals to Reform the European Court of Human Rights |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
NGOs and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
|
|
47 | (10) |
|
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Civil Society, NGOs and Human Rights |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Human Rights NGOs and the Victims |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
NGOs' Legal Standing in the Petition and Judicial Contexts |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
NGOs and Standard Setting |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
NGOs and the Implementation of the System's Legal Resources |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Some Preliminary Conclusions |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
NGOs before the European Court of Human Rights: Beyond Amicus Curiae Participation? |
|
|
57 | (10) |
|
Marco Frigessi di Rattalma |
|
|
NGOs' Amicus Curiae Participation before the European Court of Human Rights |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
The Lex Lata: NGOs Have No General Authority to Act on behalf of Alleged Victims |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
The Lege Ferenda: Would Granting an Actio Popularis to NGOs be Appropriate? |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
A Limited Locus Standi for NGOs |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
The Role of NGOs before the United Nations Human Rights Committee |
|
|
67 | (26) |
|
|
Introduction: Mechanisms and Procedures before the United Nations Human Rights Committee |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
The System of Periodic Reports |
|
|
68 | (15) |
|
Scope and function of the reporting obligation and sources of information |
|
|
68 | (11) |
|
The actual influence of the work of NGOs in the reporting procedure |
|
|
79 | (4) |
|
Inter-state Communications |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Individual Communications |
|
|
84 | (6) |
|
Scope and functions of individual communication |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
NGOs: inclusion or exclusion? |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Possibilities pursuant to Rule of Procedure 90(b) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
Some Concluding Remarks on NGOs and the European Court of Human Rights |
|
|
93 | (12) |
|
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
Role of Human Rights NGOs |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Third Party Intervention (Direct Intervention) |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
Prospects for Possible Changes |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
Part II NGOs and International Criminal Courts and Tribunals |
|
|
105 | (42) |
|
The Experience of No Peace Without Justice |
|
|
107 | (6) |
|
|
NPWJ and the NGO Coalition for an ICC |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Judicial Assistance Program |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
NPWJ and the ICTY: The Kosovo Mission |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
NGOs and the Activities of the Ad Hoc Criminal Tribunals for Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda |
|
|
113 | (8) |
|
|
Functions of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Activities of Ad Hoc Criminal Tribunals |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
Key Provisions of the Statutes and of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
The Practice of the Tribunals |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
Conditions for the Participation of NGOs as Amici Curiae in Proceedings |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Authorization from the Tribunal |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Need to Clarify the Involvement of NGOs as Amici Curiae before Ad Hoc Criminal Tribunals |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
NGOs and the Activities of the International Criminal Court |
|
|
121 | (8) |
|
Francesca Trombetta-Panigadi |
|
|
Explicit References to NGOs in the Statute and Subsidiary Documents |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
NGO Coalition for an ICC and the Recognition of its Role by the Assembly of States Parties and the Organs of the ICC |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
NGOs' Activities Today: The Policy of the Coalition |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
NGOs and the East Timor Special Panels for Serious Crimes |
|
|
129 | (14) |
|
|
The Role of NGOs in Judicial System Reconstruction in East Timor |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
NGO Coalition for an International Tribunal for East Timor |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
NGOs and the Special Panels for Serious Crimes |
|
|
135 | (6) |
|
Judicial System Monitoring Programme and its activities |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Relationship between JSMP and public institutions |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
An Assessment of the Results Achieved by NGOs in the East Timor Context |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
Some Concluding Remarks on the Role of NGOs in the ICC |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
|
The Role of NGOs in the International Legislative Process |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Action of NGOs in support of the ICC |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
Part III NGOs and International Environmental Disputes and Compliance Mechanisms |
|
|
147 | (78) |
|
The Experience of Greenpeace International |
|
|
149 | (18) |
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
International Developments on Enforcement of MEAs |
|
|
149 | (7) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Reporting, monitoring and verification of compliance and capacity-building |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Consultation and cooperation |
|
|
153 | (3) |
|
Some Examples of MEA Compliance Issues under Individual Instruments |
|
|
156 | (10) |
|
CITES and illegal logging |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
Illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
NGOs and the Aarhus Convention |
|
|
167 | (20) |
|
|
Origin and Evolution of the Aarhus Convention |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
Content of the Aarhus Convention |
|
|
169 | (8) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
The Role of NGOs in the Aarhus Convention |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
|
181 | (6) |
|
The structure and function of the Aarhus Convention compliance mechanism |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
NGO participation in the mechanism |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
Relevance of the Aarhus Convention model |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
The World Bank Inspection Panel: About Public Participation and Dispute Settlement |
|
|
187 | (18) |
|
Laurence Boisson de Chazournes |
|
|
Introduction: Evolution of the Inspection Panel's Mandate |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
Public Participation and the International Decision-making Process: The Path Opened by the World Bank Inspection Panel |
|
|
189 | (6) |
|
The Bank's operational policies and the promotion of the principle of public participation |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
The concepts of public participation, transparency and accountability at the heart of the Inspection Panel procedure |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
The Inspection Panel: A Sui Generis Settlement Procedure |
|
|
195 | (7) |
|
Seizing the World Bank Inspection Panel |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Specific features of the Inspection Panel procedure and subsequent practice |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
Conclusions: Of the Endogenous and Innovating Nature of the Inspection Panel Procedure |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
NGOs in Non-Compliance Mechanisms under Multilateral Environmental Agreements: From Tolerance to Recognition? |
|
|
205 | (20) |
|
|
Reviewing Compliance and the Role of NGOs: Introduction |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
NGO Participation in Compliance or Implementation Committees |
|
|
208 | (4) |
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Trigger Mechanism: Hidden Action or Legal Right? |
|
|
212 | (5) |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
NGOs in Fact-Finding and Assessment Phases |
|
|
217 | (4) |
|
|
217 | (3) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Overcoming States' Resistance: A Prospect for the Future? |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
Annex: List of Relevant Instruments and Documents |
|
|
222 | (3) |
|
Part IV NGOs and Inter-State and European Disputes |
|
|
225 | (68) |
|
Non-Governmental Organizations and the International Court of Justice |
|
|
227 | (6) |
|
|
The Statute and Rules: No Role for NGOs |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
NGOs and Law of the Sea Disputes |
|
|
233 | (10) |
|
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
Non-state Entities, UNCLOS and the Rules of the Tribunal |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
Non-state Entities as Parties or Intervening Parties |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
Participation of Non-state Entities in Proceedings before ITLOS |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
CIEL's Experience in WTO Dispute Settlement: Challenges and Complexities from a Practical Point of View |
|
|
243 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (5) |
|
United States -- Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
European Communities -- Measures affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
European Communities -- Measures affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
|
249 | (5) |
|
Potential roles for amicus curiae briefs |
|
|
249 | (2) |
|
Limits on amicus curiae briefs' potential roles |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
Mechanics of Submitting an Amicus Curiae Brief |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Political Reality of Different WTO Members |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
NGOs and the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism |
|
|
261 | (10) |
|
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
|
262 | (5) |
|
Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
The Accessibility of European Integration Courts from an NGO Perspective |
|
|
271 | (22) |
|
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
Role of the European Integration Courts |
|
|
271 | (3) |
|
|
274 | (2) |
|
Avenues for Participation in the European Judicial Process |
|
|
276 | (12) |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
Third party interventions |
|
|
277 | (3) |
|
|
280 | (8) |
|
Partial Exclusion: The Case of Public Interest NGOs |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
Part V Concluding Remarks |
|
|
293 | (20) |
|
The Amicus Curiae in International Courts: Towards Common Procedural Approaches? |
|
|
295 | (18) |
|
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
Basic Procedural Approaches to Amicus Curiae Briefs |
|
|
296 | (2) |
|
Objections to Amicus Curiae Submissions |
|
|
298 | (3) |
|
Added value of Amicus Curiae Submissions |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
Additional burden imposed by amicus curiae submissions |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
Identity of the potential amicus curiae |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
Confidentiality and transparency issues |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
Can Procedural Approaches Meet Concerns about Amicus Curiae Intervention? |
|
|
301 | (8) |
|
Filtering mechanisms: procedures for applications for leave to file an amicus curiae brief |
|
|
302 | (2) |
|
Procedural rules to clarify the role of the amicus curiae brief |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
Identity of the amicus curiae: disclosure of interests and affiliations |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
Other procedural rules to manage any additional burden on the court and on the parties |
|
|
306 | (2) |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
Addressing issues of confidentiality and transparency |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (4) |
Index |
|
313 | |