Foreword |
|
xiii | |
Preface |
|
xv | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xvii | |
|
Introduction to Attitudes and Persuasion |
|
|
3 | (36) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Why Do People Have Attitudes? |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
How Are Attitudes Measured? |
|
|
9 | (13) |
|
|
9 | (7) |
|
|
16 | (6) |
|
Direct versus Indirect Assessment of Attitudes |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Do Attitudes Predict Behaviors? |
|
|
22 | (7) |
|
What Kinds of Attitudes Predict Behaviors? |
|
|
23 | (5) |
|
What Other Variables Enhance Behavioral Prediction? |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
How Is Attitude Change Studied Experimentally? |
|
|
29 | (6) |
|
Conceptual and Operational Levels of Research |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
The Validity of the Attitude Change Experiment |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
The Approaches to Persuasion |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
Conditioning and Modeling Approaches |
|
|
39 | (20) |
|
|
40 | (7) |
|
Classical Conditioning of Attitudes |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
Demand Characteristics and Contingency Awareness |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
|
47 | (4) |
|
Operant Conditioning of Attitudes |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Two-factor Theory of Verbal Conditioning |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
Vicarious Classical Conditioning |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
The Message-learning Approach |
|
|
59 | (36) |
|
Skills Learning as a Model for Persuasion |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Determinants of Attitude Change in Persuasive Communications |
|
|
60 | (33) |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
|
69 | (11) |
|
|
80 | (5) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
The Persistence of Attitude Change |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
|
95 | (30) |
|
Adaptation Level Approach |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
The Social Judgment---Involvement Approach |
|
|
99 | (11) |
|
Communication Discrepancy |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
Evaluation of Social Judgment Theory |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
The Variable Perspective Approach |
|
|
110 | (12) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
Unresolved Issues in Perspective Theory |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
Comparisons of Approaches: Perception versus Description |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
|
125 | (38) |
|
Cognitive Elements and Systems |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
The Motive to Maintain Cognitive Consistency |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
127 | (6) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Determining Imbalance in a Cognitive System |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Consequences of Imbalance |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (4) |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
The Domain of Congruity Theory |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Determining and Resolving Disequilibrium (Incongruity) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
The Mathematics of Congruity Theory |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
Cognitive Dissonance Theory |
|
|
137 | (15) |
|
Effects of Cognitive Dissonance |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Effect of Disconfirming an Important Belief |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Dissonance and the Decision Process |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
Insufficient Justification |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
Necessary Conditions for Dissonance Arousal |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
Temporal Characteristics of Dissonance Reduction |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
The Nature of Cognitive Dissonance |
|
|
148 | (4) |
|
Impression Management Theory |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
Psychological Reactance Theory |
|
|
155 | (5) |
|
What Does It Take to Arouse Reactance? |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Consequences of the Arousal of Reactance |
|
|
157 | (3) |
|
|
160 | (3) |
|
|
163 | (20) |
|
|
165 | (5) |
|
The Foot-in-the-door Effect |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
Overjustification Effects |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
Effects of Internal Sensations on Self-perception and Attitudes: Dissonance versus Self-perception |
|
|
170 | (4) |
|
Effects of Ambiguous Internal Cues on Attitudes |
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Effects of Bogus Physiological Feedback |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
Recipients' Attribution Regarding the Cause of a Communicator's Behavior |
|
|
177 | (3) |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
|
183 | (30) |
|
Probabilogical Approaches to Belief Change |
|
|
184 | (9) |
|
The Theory of Reasoned Action |
|
|
193 | (11) |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
|
198 | (2) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Changing Beliefs, Attitudes, Norms, Intentions, and Behaviors |
|
|
200 | (4) |
|
Information Integration Theory (Cognitive Algebra) |
|
|
204 | (7) |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Self-persuasion Approaches |
|
|
213 | (42) |
|
The Role-playing Approach: Active Participation versus Passive Exposure |
|
|
213 | (7) |
|
The Persistence of Attitude Changes Produced by Role Playing |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
Why Is Role Playing So Effective? |
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
Can Dissonance Theory Account for Role-playing Effects? |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
Mere Thought as a Determinant of Attitude Polarization |
|
|
220 | (5) |
|
Empirical Research on Mere Thought |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
Other Determinants of Mere Thought |
|
|
223 | (2) |
|
The Cognitive Response Approach to Persuasion |
|
|
225 | (26) |
|
Premessage Inductions That Produce Resistance to Persuasion |
|
|
226 | (6) |
|
Premessage Inductions That Affect the Motivation to Process a Message |
|
|
232 | (6) |
|
Effects of Message, Context, and Recipient Inductions |
|
|
238 | (10) |
|
The Postmessage Persistence of Persuasion |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
Evaluation of Self-persuasion Approaches |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (3) |
|
Epilog: A General Framework for Understanding Attitude Change Processes |
|
|
255 | (16) |
|
Central versus Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change |
|
|
255 | (7) |
|
Anticipatory Attitude Changes |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
The Relative Importance of Source and Message Factors in Persuasion |
|
|
258 | (2) |
|
The Relative Importance of Recipient and Message Factors in Persuasion |
|
|
260 | (2) |
|
The Elaboration Likelihood Model |
|
|
262 | (6) |
|
Motivation and Ability to Process the Message |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
Motivation and Ability to Think about the Issue |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
The Central Route: A Difficult Way to Change Attitudes |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
The Peripheral Route: Attitude Change without Issue-relevant Thinking |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
268 | (3) |
References |
|
271 | (30) |
Author Index |
|
301 | (8) |
Subject Index |
|
309 | |