Preface |
|
ix | (1) |
Acknowledgements |
|
x | (1) |
Acronyms and abbreviations |
|
xi | |
|
|
1 | (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
II. The rationale for this study |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
III. The scope, method and conduct of the study |
|
|
4 | |
|
Table 1.1. Four major themes of this study |
|
|
5 | |
|
Figure 1.1. A sample of essential public services required by society |
|
|
2 | |
|
|
8 | (40) |
|
Chinese Country Study Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
II. The arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
9 | (18) |
|
III. The domestic context |
|
|
27 | (9) |
|
IV. Factors influencing arms procurement |
|
|
36 | (5) |
|
|
41 | |
|
Table 2.1. The Chinese defence budget, 1953-80 |
|
|
28 | |
|
Figure 2.1. High-level organizations in Chinese arms procurement decision making |
|
|
10 | |
|
Figure 2.2. Organization of arms procurement bureaux and institutes in the PLA |
|
|
13 | |
|
Figure 2.3 The research and information establishments of China's Central Military Commission |
|
|
16 | |
|
Figure 2.4. Stages in the Chinese military R&D process |
|
|
20 | |
|
Appendix 2A. China's military R&D, manufacturing and trading |
|
|
43 | |
|
Appendix 2B. The development of coastal minesweepers by the PLAN in the 1980s |
|
|
45 | |
|
Figure 2B.1. Organizations involved in the development of a warship |
|
|
47 | |
|
|
48 | (43) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
II. The arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
49 | (14) |
|
III. The Indo-Soviet arms transfer relationship |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
IV. Deficiencies in the process |
|
|
66 | |
|
V. Conclusions and recommendations |
|
|
83 | |
|
Figure 3.1. Organization involved in the Indian arms procurement and review process, 1997 |
|
|
50 | |
|
Figure 3.2. The arms procurement decision-making process in the Indian Ministry of Defence |
|
|
52 | |
|
Figure 3.3. Information and decision channels in the Indian arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
55 | |
|
Appendix 3A. India's defence R&D and production establishments |
|
|
88 | |
|
|
91 | (40) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
II. The arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
94 | (4) |
|
III. Threat assessment and Israeli security planning |
|
|
98 | (6) |
|
IV. External influences on arms procurement |
|
|
104 | (4) |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
VI. Influence of the defence industry |
|
|
111 | (5) |
|
|
116 | (9) |
|
VIII. Analysis and recommendations |
|
|
125 | (5) |
|
|
130 | |
|
Table 4.1. US military aid to Israel, 1949-95 |
|
|
105 | |
|
Table 4.2. The Israeli defence budget by category, 1989-94 |
|
|
109 | |
|
Table 4.3. The Israeli defence industry: sales and exports, 1980-95 |
|
|
112 | |
|
Table 4.4. Subsidies for Israeli state-owned defence firms, 1991-94 |
|
|
116 | |
|
Figure 4.1. Major actors in the Israeli defence establishment |
|
|
96 | |
|
Figure 4.2. Military technology evaluation procedure in Israel |
|
|
102 | |
|
Figure 4.3. Evaluation of the equipment needs of the Israeli infantry based on decision tree analysis |
|
|
103 | |
|
|
131 | (46) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
II. The arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
133 | (12) |
|
|
145 | (6) |
|
IV. R&D and domestic production in arms procurement |
|
|
151 | (10) |
|
V. Factors which constrain the rationality of arms procurement in Japan |
|
|
161 | (10) |
|
|
171 | |
|
Table 5.1. The Japanese defence budget and its share of GNP, 1955-95 |
|
|
136 | |
|
Table 5.2. Stages in the defence and arms procurement decision-making process in Japan |
|
|
139 | |
|
Table 5.3. Changes in the composition of Japanese defence expenditure (original budget), FYs 1992-96 |
|
|
146 | |
|
Table 5.4. Budget allocations to the Japanese Self-Defense Forces, 1992-96 |
|
|
147 | |
|
Table 5.5. Annual process of compiling the Japanese defence budget |
|
|
148 | |
|
Table 5.6. Government expenditure on defence R&D in select countries |
|
|
152 | |
|
Table 5.7. Ratios of defence production to industrial production and of domestic procurement to total procurement in Japan, 1985-94 |
|
|
158 | |
|
Table 5.8. Defence production by category as a percentage of total industrial production in Japan, 1994 (preliminary) |
|
|
159 | |
|
Figure 5.1. Coordination of foreign and security policy making in Japan |
|
|
141 | |
|
Figure 5.2. Actors involved in arms procurement decision making in the Japan Defense Agency and the Self-Defense Forces |
|
|
144 | |
|
Figure 5.3. The role of the Japanese Central Procurement Office in the arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
145 | |
|
Figure 5.4. The organization of the Japanese Technical Research and Development Institute |
|
|
153 | |
|
Figure 5.5. Flow-chart of defence R&D planning in Japan |
|
|
156 | |
|
|
177 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
II. The arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
179 | (23) |
|
III. Problems with the arms procurement process and recommendations |
|
|
202 | (7) |
|
IV. Conclusions: short-and long-term developments |
|
|
209 | |
|
Table 6.1. Major activities of the force improvement plan, 1974-94 |
|
|
183 | |
|
Table 6.2. Major arms to be procured under the Mid-Term National Defense Plan for 2001 |
|
|
184 | |
|
Table 6.3. Procurement by source: domestic, foreign and US, 1988-94 |
|
|
185 | |
|
Table 6.4. Defence R&D investment in South Korea, 1970-95 |
|
|
192 | |
|
Table 6.5. South Korean imports of major conventional weapons, 1980-96 |
|
|
193 | |
|
Table 6.6. Rank of offset preferences based on technological merit |
|
|
197 | |
|
Table 6.7. Technology assessment for domestic R&D |
|
|
198 | |
|
Table 6.8. Methods of arms acquisitions in South Korea, 1970- |
|
|
200 | |
|
Table 6.9. Designated defence products and contractors, 1996 |
|
|
201 | |
|
Table 6.10. Time span of the arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
204 | |
|
Table 6.11. Offset rates provided by the 50 largest US arms exporting companies, 1980-87 |
|
|
205 | |
|
Table 6.12. Comparison of offset rates and directed buy-back requirement in the F/A-18 co-production programmes |
|
|
206 | |
|
Figure 6.1. South Korea's National Defense Planning and Management System |
|
|
180 | |
|
Figure 6.2. Main stages in South Korea's arms procurement process |
|
|
187 | |
|
|
211 | (31) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
II. The arms procurement decision-making process |
|
|
212 | (11) |
|
III. Arms procurement programmes |
|
|
223 | (3) |
|
IV. Problems with the existing structure |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
V. Factors affecting arms procurement |
|
|
228 | (6) |
|
VI. An `ideal type' of process |
|
|
234 | (6) |
|
|
240 | |
|
Table 7.1. Equipment holdings of the armed forces of Thailand and its neighbouring countries, as of 1 August 1996 |
|
|
225 | |
|
Table 7.2. The Thai Ministry of Defence budget, 1982-97 |
|
|
229 | |
|
Table 7.3. Costs of the Thai equipment procurement and force modernization programmes, 1997 |
|
|
230 | |
|
Table 7.4. Breakdown of the Thai Ministry of Defence budget, 1982, 1985 and 1990 |
|
|
231 | |
|
Table 7.5. Breakdown of the Thai Ministry of Defence budget, 1992-95 |
|
|
232 | |
|
Figure 7.1. The arms procurement structure in the Thai armed services |
|
|
214 | |
|
Figure 7.2. The arms procurement structure at the Thai Supreme Command Headquarters |
|
|
215 | |
|
Figure 7.3. The arms procurement structure at the Thai Ministry of Defence |
|
|
216 | |
|
Figure 7.4. The arms procurement structure in the Thai Parliament and Cabinet |
|
|
217 | |
|
Figure 7.5. A Model arms procurement structure for the Thai military |
|
|
236 | |
|
Figure 7.6. A Model arms procurement structure for the Thai Parliament |
|
|
237 | |
|
|
242 | (35) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
II. Military and politico-security issues |
|
|
243 | (7) |
|
III. Defence budgets, financial planning and audit |
|
|
250 | (5) |
|
IV. Techno-industrial issues |
|
|
255 | (8) |
|
V. Organizational behaviour and public-interest issues |
|
|
263 | (8) |
|
|
271 | |
|
Table 8.1. Manpower ratios and personnel costs in Indian and Japanese R&D institutes |
|
|
257 | |
|
Table 8.2. High-technology engineering exports to the USA from China and India, 1991 |
|
|
260 | |
Annexe A. Research questions |
|
277 | (20) |
Annexe B. Abstracts |
|
297 | (10) |
Annexe C. About the contributors |
|
307 | (8) |
Index |
|
315 | |